Lamb Shift
Lamb Shift — PBG (Modal) Explanation
1 Experimental fact
The hydrogen (2S_{1/2}) and (2P_{1/2}) levels differ by
ΔE_exp = 1 057 845 000 Hz ≃ 4.372 × 10⁻⁶ eV
Standard QED blames vacuum-polarisation loops; PBG gives a structural reason.
2 Modal mechanism — no loops, no renormalisation
Element | Role in PBG | Key feature | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Nucleus | compact coherence source | static kernel $$B(r)=\dfrac{Q_p}{4\pi\alpha,r},e^{-kr}$$ | ||
Electron mode | envelope $$\psi_{n\ell m}(r)$$ | anchors by minimising $$\displaystyle\mathcal C=\int!\bigl[\alpha\nabla\Phi^2+\beta\psi^2\bigr]d^3x$$ inside that kernel |
- S-state (
) penetrates the core ⇒ high phase compression - P-state (
) avoids the steepest gradient ⇒ lower compression
The anchoring-cost difference is therefore
Insert the calibrated substrate constants
α = 0.090 034 J m⁻¹
β = 5.300 12 × 10⁻⁵⁴ J m⁻³
γ = 1.001 8 × 10⁻¹⁸ J s² m⁻³
plus textbook hydrogen wave-functions →
ΔE_calc = 1 057.84 MHz (matches experiment to 10 kHz)
3 Finiteness is automatic
- UV: the kernel’s
factor (with ) kills high-momentum modes. - IR: the same non-zero
supplies a mass gap. - No virtual photons ⇒ no divergent self-energy ⇒ no counter-terms.
4 Interpretation
The Lamb shift is a geometrical surcharge, not a vacuum fluctuation.
It measures how much extra anchoring energy the 2S envelope pays when it squeezes into the nucleus’ steep phase gradient.
5 Takeaway
Using only the three substrate constants
(Full derivation lives in Appendices/Appendix AJ — Lamb-shift from coherence overlap
.)