3-D Envelope of Proton/Neutron
3-D Envelope Implementation
(Proton & Neutron numeric validation – rebuilt 2025-06-10)
Purpose – Show that a full 3-D cost-minimisation reproduces the
three-sheet analytic model for nucleons and matches all observables
to ≈ 1 %.
Cost functional, constantsare imported from
[[Foundations/Full-Derivations#§1.-Core-Action-with-Matter-Coupling]].
1 Domain & Discretisation
| Item | Choice |
|---|---|
| Simulation box | Cube |
| Boundary condition | Absorbing faces ( |
| Grid spacing | |
| Unknowns per node | Density |
Comment – the 8 real
in an
continuous ramps in one or more
2 Initial Seed
- Superpose three radial
ramps (choose +++or++–normals) to
guarantee total winding(see
[[Coherence-Anchored Structural Model]]). - Envelope
: Gaussian with width fm reproduces the
empirical charge radiusof the proton.
3 Minimisation Loop
- Cost evaluation — adopt static part of anchoring action
where and
(constantsfrom Foundations §5). - Gradient-flow step on
and all . - Update coherence field by solving
with (see Foundations §1). - Convergence check — stop when
.
Any finite-element or FFT-based lattice solver can implement the loop.
4 Diagnostics
| Check | Criterion |
|---|---|
| Colour neutrality | |
| Total anchoring cost | |
| Loop holonomy | |
| Observables |
5 Expected Numeric Outputs
| Quantity | Proton | Neutron |
|---|---|---|
| Charge radius |
0.83 fm | 0.83 fm |
| Magnetic radius |
0.83 fm | 0.86 fm |
| 5.59 | –3.82 | |
| Core density |
— |
Core density converts to an effective
with PDG values at
6 Refinement Path
- Second/third-order kernel — import
corrections from
Concept-v2 Stage D Step 15. - Edge sharpness — add saturation term
to tune confinement radius. - Spin-½ test — rotate envelope by
; cost is unchanged but
the wavefunction flips sign, returning only after. - Hyperons — move one sheet to a radial node; re-minimise to predict
masses.
Back to nucleon overview → [[Coherence-Anchored Structural Model]]
Magnetic‐moment derivation → [[Magnetic-Moment Structures]]