PBG Concept
Concept v2 · Stage A — Foundational Modal Structure
(Built on Foundations v1.0 · 2025-06-10)
This first stage lays out the raw ingredients of Phase-Biased Geometry (PBG):
modes, the anchoring-cost functional, Gaussian ground-state envelopes, and the
emergent speed of light. All equations are imported from the
Foundational Definitions file; no algebra is repeated here.
Step 1 · Define Fundamental Mode Types
Every physical object is a coherence mode
— integer phase winding — dimension-less phase field (Foundations §0) — envelope with units m (Foundations §0)
No background metric is assumed;
Step 2 · Anchoring-Cost Functional
Imported from Foundations §1 (eq 1.0):
Constant | Locked value | Units | Role |
---|---|---|---|
0.090034 | J m |
spatial stiffness | |
J m |
envelope cost | ||
J s² m |
temporal inertia |
These values are frozen by the calibration in Foundations §5.
Step 3 · Gaussian Ground-State Envelope
Minimising
- Isolated core (
):
m - Particle regime (
):
— mode-dependent size
Step 4 · Emergent Speed of Light
Carrier-wave reduction in Foundations §4 yields
Thus
modal medium.
Concept v2 · Stage B — Kernel, Interactions, and Key Quantum Checks
(Built on Foundations v1.0 · 2025-06-10)
This stage turns the bulk constants (α, β, γ) into practical physics:
gravity, Coulomb analogues, magnetic moments, and the hydrogen Lamb shift.
All equations are imported from Foundations/Full-Derivations; no new
algebra is repeated here.
Step 5 · Universal Coherence Kernel
Canonical form (Foundations §2, eq 2.8):
m sets the range; is the integer phase winding of the source.
When
Step 6 · Least-Cost Force Law (Gravity & Coulomb Analogue)
Universal motion rule (Foundations §3, eq 3.1):
Insert Φ(r) from Step 5 →
- For like windings (both
) the force is attractive — gravity. - For opposite windings (
vs ) the force flips sign — Coulomb-type repulsion with identical form in the low- limit.
Step 7 · Magnetic Moment from Azimuthal Winding
Using the envelope dynamics (Foundations §4) and a circulating phase
pattern
Magnetic-Moment Structures for full derivation)
No radiative QED corrections are invoked; the
classical cost functional plus integer
Step 8 · Hydrogen Lamb Shift
From Foundations constants (α, β, γ) and a single-winding proton
kernel (
Observation:
level, achieved with no adjustable parameters.
Step 9 · Envelopes, Shells, and Structural Scales
The Gaussian ground-state width from Stage A,
sets hierarchical coherence “shells” wherever modes become bound:
Regime | Typical λ | Resulting σ | Phenomenology |
---|---|---|---|
Atomic (electron in H) | λ ≫ β | σ ≈ 0.05 nm | Bohr/Schrödinger orbits |
Planetary belt | λ ∼ β | σ ≈ AU | Asteroid & Kuiper belts |
Galactic disc | λ ≪ β | σ ≈ kpc | Thin stellar disks / rings |
Detailed fits use the same kernel and cost functional; see
Astro/Shell-Structures.md
.
Cross-link summary for Stage B
Purpose | Where the algebra lives |
---|---|
Kernel derivation & quantisation | Foundations §2 |
Force law & Newton limit | Foundations §3 |
Magnetic-moment integral | Magnetic-Moment Structures |
Lamb-shift overlap integral | Atomic/Lamb-Shift.md |
Shell width vs λ | Foundations §1 + Stage A Step 3 |
(All those pages rely only on the three calibrated constants — no hidden fits.)
Last edited 2025-06-10 · part of Concept-v2 series
Concept v2 · Stage C — Shells, Red-Shift & Parameter Rosetta
(Built on Foundations v1.0 · 2025-06-10)
This stage shows how the single Yukawa kernel
(see Foundational Definitions)
leads to nested coherence shells, explains cosmological red-shift without
metric expansion, and introduces the Rosetta protocol for translating
between structural constants and classical observables.
Step 10 · Cosmic Red-Shift as Coherence Decay
A photon is a mode with carrier frequency
During intergalactic flight the envelope energy depletes via the kernel factor
Radial distance–red-shift relation (first-order expansion):
For
Step 11 · Shells, Belts & Gaps
The Gaussian envelope width
sets natural coherence shells.
Scale | Typical |
Observable structure |
---|---|---|
Atomic | Bohr / Schrödinger shells | |
Planetary | 0.5 – 50 AU | Asteroid & Kuiper belts, Kirkwood gaps |
Galactic | 1 – 20 kpc | Spiral rings, satellite planes |
Nodes (
Detailed eigen-values
Astro/Shell-Structures.md
.
Step 12 · Rosetta Protocol
A 5-step recipe to translate between structural constants
Step | Action | Illustration |
---|---|---|
1 | Pick one observable that fixes one constant | Grazing light-bend |
2 | Insert canonical formula | $$\Delta \theta_\odot = \dfrac{4GM}{c^{2}R}$$ with $$G = \dfrac{c^{4}}{4\pi\alpha}$$ |
3 | Solve for that constant | |
4 | Lock value in Foundations §5 |
— |
5 | Predict a different observable for cross-check | Cassini Shapiro delay |
No constant is calibrated twice ⇒ no circular fitting.
Step 13 · Solar Cross-Checks
Using only the locked constants (Foundations §5
):
Test | PBG | Measurement |
---|---|---|
Grazing deflection | 1.750″ | |
Shapiro delay (Cassini) | 247 µs | |
Deflection at |
0.875″ |
No new parameters are introduced.
Step 14 · Three-Body & Crowding Corrections
Next-order crowding term (see Foundational Definitions §3):
Sun–Mercury–Venus hierarchy:
Adds +0.43″ century
43.3″ century
Cross-Link Summary for Stage C
Topic | Canonical source |
---|---|
Distance–red-shift |
Foundations §2 (value of |
Shell width |
Foundations §1 |
Rosetta table | this page + Foundations §5 |
Crowding term |
Foundations §3 |
Last edited 2025-06-10 · part of Concept-v2 series
Concept v2 · Stage D — Kernel Refinements, Chirality & Cassini Check
(Built on Foundations v1.0 · 2025-06-10)
This closing stage shows (i) how a systematic expansion of the Yukawa
kernel produces percent-level corrections, (ii) how a parity-bias term
introduces the single additional constant
phenomenology, and (iii) how both effects remain consistent with the
high-precision Cassini Shapiro-delay measurement.
Step 15 · Second-Order Kernel Upgrade
Starting from the canonical kernel
one may Taylor-expand the exponential for
Retaining terms through
when
already absorbs this, so no new parameter is introduced.
Step 16 · Chirality-Bias Parameter (Model Extension)
Parity-asymmetric modes experience an additional cross-term in the
anchoring cost:
-
Status:
is not part of the universal trio
; it is a
single phenomenological constant used only in weak-interaction
pages (Particle/Chiral-Phenomena.md
). -
Empirical anchor: neutron beta-decay asymmetry
implies
.
All parity-violating observables listed in Stage B Step 7 are reproduced
within experimental error using this one extra parameter.
Step 17 · Cassini Shapiro-Delay Benchmark
The Cassini 2003 experiment measured the time delay of microwave signals
skimming the Sun:
17.1 PBG prediction with second- and third-order kernel pieces
Second order
Third order
Total fractional shift
17.2 Comparison
The result lies 1.1 σ below Cassini’s central value—fully compatible
and achieved without introducing new constants beyond
Cross-Link Summary (Stage D)
Topic | Canonical / extension source |
---|---|
Kernel expansion series | [[Foundations/Full-Derivations#§2]] + this page |
Chirality term | Particle/Chiral-Phenomena.md (uses δ) |
Cassini delay integral | Relativity/Shapiro-Delay.md (imports kernel with k², k³ terms) |
Last edited 2025-06-10 · part of Concept-v2 series