Appendix Y — Derivation 25: Continuum Mechanics of Coherence Media
Appendix Y — Derivation 25: Continuum Mechanics of Coherence Media
(Built on Foundations v1.0 • 2025-06-10)
Large-scale PBG systems—galactic discs, dense plasmas, saturation fronts—
are best described by a continuum limit.
Here we derive the fluid-like balance laws that follow directly from the
locked anchoring Lagrangian
1 Field variables
Symbol | Meaning | Units |
---|---|---|
coherence density | m⁻³ | |
phase potential | 1 | |
anchoring energy field | J | |
phase-velocity field | m⁻¹ |
Define coherence current
2 Continuity with decoherence sink
Conservation of total modal content:
A phenomenological sink
models turnover as
3 Anchoring stress tensor
Spatial part of
Define
Units: α [J m⁻¹]·m⁻²·m⁻³ → J m⁻³ (stress) ✔︎.
4 Momentum-like balance
Introduce modal “momentum density”
Variation of the action with respect to
Right-hand side is the anchoring bias gradient plus a decoherence
drag
5 Decoherence and saturation model
A minimal choice,
with one phenomenological constant
ensures divergence as
6 Closure: continuum PBG equations
- Coherence continuity (2.1)
- Momentum balance (4.1)
- Helmholtz field
(static limit of Foundations §1)
Together they form a structurally reactive fluid-elastic system:
phase gradients play the role of velocity, β-pressure supplies bulk
compressibility, and anchoring bias drives “gravitational” motion.
Notes & next steps
- Set
by matching laboratory decoherence times; all other
coefficients are fixed constants. - Add viscosity-like term if phase-shear dissipation is needed for galaxy
disc simulations. - Compare with MHD equations to map PBG coherence flow onto plasma
behaviour.
Last edited 2025-06-10 • dimensional checks vs Foundations v1.0 complete
Appendix X - Coherence Kernel | [Index](./Appendix Master) | Appendix Z