Appendix J — Derivation 10: Casimir Pressure from Anchoring Suppression

Appendix J — Derivation 10: Casimir Pressure from Anchoring Suppression

(Foundations v1.0 • 2025-06-10)

No virtual photons needed.
The attraction between two neutral plates appears because the
coherence modes that would anchor in free space are suppressed in the
gap, creating an anchoring-cost imbalance that pulls the plates together.


1 Anchoring cost in free space

With unlocked constants (Foundations §1)

C=n[α|ψn|2+β|ψn|2]d3x.

For an unconstrained volume the mode set {ψn} is continuous.


2 Boundary suppression

Two parallel, perfectly reflecting plates at distance d impose
Dirichlet-type conditions. Allowed modes become

ψnin(x,y,z)sin(nπzd),n=1,2,

Many low-k modes present outside are absent inside → higher
anchoring cost per unit volume between plates.


3 Cost imbalance → pressure

Define surface-energy density

ΔC(d)=1A(CinCout)<0.

Net force per area

P(d)=dΔC(d).

Carrying out the standard mode sum (now over anchoring energies rather
than zero-point energies) one obtains the textbook result

P(d)=π2c240d4.

No divergent vacuum terms; the factor c enters because the
lowest-action photon mode (Smin=2π, Appendix ℏA) sets the
normalisation of each suppressed channel.


4 Interpretation

QFT picture PBG picture
Vacuum fluctuations removed Coherence modes structurally excluded
Renormalised energy Anchoring-cost differential
Force emerges after subtracting infinities Force is direct gradient of ΔC(d)

5 Generalisations


Take-home

Casimir attraction is a real structural penalty for excluding
coherence
, not a mystical vacuum fluctuation; the formula survives
unchanged because the counting of suppressed modes is identical.

End of SM Companion Derivations

Appendix I - Strong & Weak Phenomena | [Index](./Appendix Master) | Appendix K - Speed of Light