Appendix J — Derivation 10: Casimir Pressure from Anchoring Suppression
Appendix J — Derivation 10: Casimir Pressure from Anchoring Suppression
(Foundations v1.0 • 2025-06-10)
No virtual photons needed.
The attraction between two neutral plates appears because the
coherence modes that would anchor in free space are suppressed in the
gap, creating an anchoring-cost imbalance that pulls the plates together.
1 Anchoring cost in free space
With unlocked constants (Foundations §1)
For an unconstrained volume the mode set
2 Boundary suppression
Two parallel, perfectly reflecting plates at distance
Dirichlet-type conditions. Allowed modes become
Many low-
anchoring cost per unit volume between plates.
3 Cost imbalance → pressure
Define surface-energy density
Net force per area
Carrying out the standard mode sum (now over anchoring energies rather
than zero-point energies) one obtains the textbook result
No divergent vacuum terms; the factor
lowest-action photon mode (
normalisation of each suppressed channel.
4 Interpretation
QFT picture | PBG picture |
---|---|
Vacuum fluctuations removed | Coherence modes structurally excluded |
Renormalised energy | Anchoring-cost differential |
Force emerges after subtracting infinities | Force is direct gradient of |
5 Generalisations
- Curved plates → replace
by local eigenfunctions. - Layered media → predicts van der Waals forces without dipole
fluctuations. - Cosmology → large-scale voids act as anchoring suppression zones,
yielding small negative pressure akin to dark-energy phenomenology.
Take-home
Casimir attraction is a real structural penalty for excluding
coherence, not a mystical vacuum fluctuation; the formula survives
unchanged because the counting of suppressed modes is identical.
End of SM Companion Derivations
Appendix I - Strong & Weak Phenomena | [Index](./Appendix Master) | Appendix K - Speed of Light