Uncertainty Principle
Appendix AR — Derivation of the Uncertainty Principle from PBG Anchoring Cost
(Locked derivation • Foundations v1.0 • 2025-06-10)
Result. For any mode in Phase-Biased Geometry
$$
\boxed{;\Delta x,\Delta p ;\ge; \dfrac{\hbar}{2};}
Units ([[Foundations/Full-Derivations#§0]]
):
- Phase field
; local momentum defined by - Anchoring cost density (static part, Foundations §1):
For localisation analysis we set
and focus on the gradient term.
2 Spatial and momentum variances
Define expectation values over the envelope:
Then
3 Anchoring cost as a quadratic form
Using
Expressed as envelope averages:
(Units: J m⁻¹ · m⁻² · m³ = J.)
4 Cauchy–Schwarz bound
Consider the operator pair
For any normalised
The Robertson–Schwarz inequality (pure algebra, no measurement lore):
5 Anchoring-cost interpretation
- Localising
— shrinking forces larger gradients
, which in turn increase the cost term
via (3.1). - Minimising total cost subject to one full phase cycle
() leads to the tight inequality (4.1). - Thus the
bound is the price of maintaining coherence
under simultaneous spatial and momentum confinement.
6 Equality case (Gaussian envelope)
Take
Then
Minimising the total static cost
with respect to
A Gaussian packet therefore saturates the bound—identical to standard QM.
7 Unit consistency check
m, kg m s⁻¹. - Product → J s (action).
- RHS
is J s. ✔️
8 Summary
- The inequality
is a direct algebraic
consequence of the phase operator pairacting on a
normalised envelope—no probabilistic or observer postulate used. - In PBG the same bound arises physically because anchoring cost explodes
if one attempts to squeeze bothand the phase gradient (momentum)
simultaneously. The constantis the action-per-cycle already
derived from the photon packet (Appendix AS - Planck ℏA).
Last edited 2025-06-10 • uses only Foundations equations and