Appendix AD — Derivation 29: Chiral Anchoring and Structural Parity Asymmetry
Appendix AD — Derivation 29
Chiral Anchoring & Structural Parity Asymmetry
Phase-Biased Geometry (PBG) has no imposed chiral couplings, yet weak-like parity violation emerges naturally.
The key is a handed phase winding interacting with a directional coherence gradient.
1 Phase–winding modes
A helical mode is written
where
= left-handed twist = right-handed twist
The anchoring field obeys the static Helmholtz result
so
2 Directional anchoring tension
Define the directional anchoring energy
- If $\nabla\theta_\pm $aligns with
→→ favoured anchoring. - If it opposes
→→ penalised anchoring.
Because
they generally yield different
3 Anchoring cost asymmetry
Total energies
- If
→ left-helical modes prevail. - If
→ right-helical modes prevail.
In the early-universe coherence gradient (Appendix R) one finds
4 Physical consequences
PBG statement | Observed SM analogue | ||
---|---|---|---|
Only helical modes with minimal anchoring cost enter coherence-driven interactions | Left-handed fermions couple to the weak force | ||
Opposite-helicity modes decohere rapidly | Absence of right-handed neutrinos | ||
Bias strength tracks |
Electroweak scale sets size of SM asymmetry |
5 Observables & tests
- CMB polarisation: small TE-correlation chirality predicted from residual large-scale
. - Laboratory chiral media: tailored coherence gradients should favour one helical photon mode over the other → test with anisotropic cavities.
- Neutrino experiments: slight environment-dependent helicity drift expected if
can be modulated (dense matter vs. vacuum).
6 Summary
Parity violation in PBG is geometric:
a phase-winding’s handedness couples unequally to directional coherence gradients, producing a built-in chiral bias without axial gauge terms.
Appendix AC - Coherence Class Chi | [Index](./Appendix Master) | Appendix AE - Continuum Mechanics