Appendix AD — Derivation 29: Chiral Anchoring and Structural Parity Asymmetry

Appendix AD — Derivation 29

Chiral Anchoring & Structural Parity Asymmetry

Phase-Biased Geometry (PBG) has no imposed chiral couplings, yet weak-like parity violation emerges naturally.
The key is a handed phase winding interacting with a directional coherence gradient.


1 Phase–winding modes

A helical mode is written

ψ(x)=ρ(x)exp[i(kx+θ±(x))],

where

The anchoring field obeys the static Helmholtz result
α2BβB=ρanchor
so B generally points away from dense regions.


2 Directional anchoring tension

Define the directional anchoring energy

T±=ρ2(θ±B)d3x.

Because θ+and θhave opposite twists,
they generally yield different T.


3 Anchoring cost asymmetry

Total energies

C±=C0+T±,ΔC=C+C.

In the early-universe coherence gradient (Appendix R) one finds
|B|0 and typically
T+<Tleft-handed bias.


4 Physical consequences

PBG statement Observed SM analogue
Only helical modes with minimal anchoring cost enter coherence-driven interactions Left-handed fermions couple to the weak force
Opposite-helicity modes decohere rapidly Absence of right-handed neutrinos
Bias strength tracks B (denser eras ⇒ stronger parity violation) Electroweak scale sets size of SM asymmetry

5 Observables & tests


6 Summary

Parity violation in PBG is geometric:
a phase-winding’s handedness couples unequally to directional coherence gradients, producing a built-in chiral bias without axial gauge terms.

Appendix AC - Coherence Class Chi | [Index](./Appendix Master) | Appendix AE - Continuum Mechanics