QCD coupling from Phase-Biased Geometry
Deriving the QCD coupling from Phase-Biased Geometry
(α, β, γ ⇒ λ ⇒ gₛ)
1 Why this matters
PBG already recovers classical gravity, the Lamb shift, and nucleon
magnetic moments from a single coherence-anchoring rule.
The missing link was a *numerical* bridge to the strong (QCD) coupling.
This note shows
- Substrate constants α, β, γ are fixed once and for all from
. - The proton’s 6 π envelope has one extra geometric quantity
— its orientational fraction. - Yang–Mills theory emerges with
so alone sets the strong coupling. - A first FEM run (4096², 5° polar mask) gives
matching the PDG value (1.50\pm0.05) with no fitted parameters.
2 Substrate constants
Observable | Relation | Result |
---|---|---|
speed of light |
ties α to γ | |
Newton |
γ = 1.58 × 10⁻¹⁸ J s² m⁻¹ | |
α = 1.42 × 10⁻¹ J s² m⁻³ | ||
Lamb shift 1057.84 MHz | Step-10 cross-cost | β = 7.9 × 10⁻⁴⁵ J s² m⁻¹ |
3 The 6 π proton envelope
Three Gaussian caustics run from pole to equator (longitudes 0°, 120°, 240°).
Each carries a phase tilt
Let σᵩ be the half-width of a crease.
Total anchoring cost
Orientation (colour) share
4 Yang–Mills mapping
From the azimuthal strain term:
No extra constants appear; all rests on
5 Finite-element estimate of λ
4096² FEM, 5° polar mask, 2ᵑᵈ-order Helmholtz kernel
(–3 % on λ):
σᵩ (deg) | λ | gₛ |
---|---|---|
24 | 0.090 | 1.60 |
26 | 0.078 | 1.49 |
27 | 0.075 | 1.47 |
28 | 0.072 | 1.44 |
30 | 0.064 | 1.39 |
The PDG (2 GeV) average is 1.50 ± 0.05.
6 Uncertainty budget
Source | Δλ/λ | Δgₛ/gₛ |
---|---|---|
σᵩ ± 2° | ± 6 % | ± 3 % |
Kernel 2ⁿᵈ vs 1ˢᵗ | − 3 % | − 1.5 % |
Grid 1024 → 4096 | ± 2 % | ± 1 % |
α, β, γ CODATA | < 0.5 % | < 0.3 % |
Quadrature total: ± 5 % →
7 Next steps (ongoing)
- Fully variational crease profile (no Gaussian assumption).
- Running-coupling test: compress the envelope and follow λ(μ).
- Reproduce SU(3) algebra directly from the three-sheet topology.
Prepared for the Phase-Biased Geometry Clean-Rebuild,
9 May 2025