Appendix G — Derivation 7: Gauge Symmetry from Anchoring Invariance
Appendix G — Derivation 7: Gauge symmetry as anchoring-cost invariance
0 Anchoring cost recap
For a scalar coherence mode
the quadratic cost density is
1 U(1) phase symmetry
1.1 Global phase (trivial)
1.2 Local phase rotation
The gradient term becomes
Cost increases unless the medium supplies a compensating twist.
Define a compensating field
and a covariant derivative
With this replacement
so the density (0.1) is form-invariant:
▶ Gauge principle emerges as anchoring invariance;
(A_i) is not independent but a derived object.
2 Non-Abelian extension (SU(N))
Let
Quadratic colour cost (Appendix-QCD)
2.1 Local SU(N) rotation
Write
and define the colour-covariant derivative
Then
so (2.1) is invariant.
▶ Gauge bosons
3 Charge & current from Noether-like identity
Take the variation of the action under an infinitesimal
Setting (\delta S=0) for arbitrary θ gives
i.e. charge conservation with
4 SU(2) and SU(3) in the PBG language
-
SU(2) internal doublet
.
Balanced anchoring (equal) ⇒ cost invariant under any internal rotation; mixing angle plays the role of weak isospin. -
SU(3) triplet anchors compete via quartic term in QCD appendix.
Only colour-neutral composites minimise global cost ⇒ confinement emerges as energy penalty for isolated colour modes.
5 Key points to tell the reader
- Gauge fields = phase-derivative geometries; not independent dynamical dofs.
- Covariant derivatives (1) & (2.2) appear naturally when demanding anchoring invariance under local internal rotations.
- Charge/current conservation follows directly from phase continuity, no extra Noether machinery.
- Higher groups (SU(2), SU(3)) are still parameter-free; the substrate constants
stay untouched.
Appendix F | [Index](./Appendix Master) | Appendix H