Four Foundational Derivation Examples

Four Foundational Examples: PBG Derivation Power

This page demonstrates, in full and explicit detail, how the modal, anchoring-cost framework of Phase-Biased Geometry (PBG) generates fundamental laws and constants of physics that are usually considered irreducible or axiomatic. The four cases below—chosen for their breadth and foundational role—show how Newtonian gravity, General Relativity, Planck’s constant, and the uncertainty principle all emerge strictly from phase, coherence, and anchoring cost. These are only samples: similar derivations exist for all other pillars of physics in this framework.


1. Newtonian Gravity from PBG

A. Stating the Target

Derive Newton’s law of gravity:

F=GMmr2

with G emerging explicitly from PBG anchoring costs and phase structure.

B. PBG Substrate and Setup

C. Modal Coherence Kernel and Cost Gradient

  1. Each mode emits a coherence bias kernel:

    (2k2)Bi(x)=Qiδ3(xxi)

    where k=β/α, and Qi is the mode’s anchoring “charge” (proportional to its coherence).

  2. Static solution:

    Bi(r)=Qi4παekrr
  3. Cost for another mode at distance r:

    Cint=ρc,2(x)B1(x)d3x
  4. Force is minus the gradient of cost:

    F=x2Cint

D. Newtonian Limit (Large Scale, Small k)

E. Identification of G

F. Summary Statement


2. General Relativity as an Emergent Limit in PBG

A. Stating the Target

Derive the core predictions of General Relativity (spacetime curvature, geodesics, gravitational redshift, light bending, perihelion precession) as emergent results of modal phase coherence and anchoring cost in PBG.

B. PBG Substrate and Anchoring Principle

C. Modal Coherence Bias and Effective "Geometry"

  1. Each massive mode produces a coherence bias (anchoring tension) kernel:

    (2k2)BM(x)=QMδ3(xxM)

    with k=β/α.

  2. Test mode (e.g., a planet or photon) seeks a least anchoring cost path:

    • Its trajectory is determined by the minimum-cost evolution of its phase structure in the presence of the source's bias.
    • The cost acts analogously to a curved metric: high coherence bias = “potential well” or “curved” region.

D. Geodesic Analogue: Least-Cost Trajectory

E. Reproducing GR Phenomena

1. Light Bending

2. Perihelion Precession

3. Gravitational Redshift

4. Cosmological Expansion

F. Mapping to the Einstein Field Equations (Emerged, Not Postulated)

G. Summary Statement

General Relativity is not fundamental in PBG, but an emergent, large-scale limit of modal phase coherence and anchoring cost.
All apparent spacetime curvature is a manifestation of gradients in phase bias.
“Metric,” “potential,” and “force” are reinterpreted as measures of coherence anchoring; geodesics are least-cost phase paths.


3. Planck’s Constant () and Quantized Action in PBG

A. Stating the Target

Show that Planck’s constant (\hbar) and the principle of quantized action ((\Delta S = n\hbar)) are emergent consequences of phase winding and anchoring cost in the PBG substrate.

B. PBG Substrate and Anchoring Principle

C. Phase Winding and Quantized Action

  1. Every mode is defined by an integer number of phase windings:

    ΦΦ+2πn,nZ
    • This is a topological constraint on allowed modal configurations.
  2. To sustain a complete phase winding (e.g., a closed loop in configuration space), the total phase change for one cycle must be 2πn.

  3. The cost functional assigns an “action” to the evolution of phase over time:

    S[Φ]=dtd3x12γ(tΦ)2

D. Quantized Action from Anchoring Cost

E. General Quantization Principle

F. Comparison with Conventional Quantum Theory

G. Summary Statement

Planck’s constant and the quantization of action are not assumed in PBG—they are the inevitable outcome of phase winding in the modal substrate and the universal anchoring cost principle.
Every “quantum” system’s discreteness, uncertainty, and action quantization is mapped to modal coherence and phase evolution, with entirely set by substrate calibration.


4. The Uncertainty Principle in Phase-Biased Geometry (PBG)

A. Stating the Target

Show that the quantum uncertainty principle

ΔxΔp2

is a necessary consequence of the modal phase coherence and anchoring cost in PBG, with no added postulates.

B. PBG Substrate and Cost Principle

C. Envelope Localization and Phase Gradient

  1. Suppose a mode is sharply localized in space:

    • Its envelope ψ(x) is narrow, with width Δx.
    • To localize phase over Δx, the spatial phase gradient |Φ| must increase.
  2. Spatial anchoring cost for this localization is

    Cspatialα|Φ|2d3x
  3. But phase gradients translate into effective momentum:

    • In modal language, pk, where k is the wavenumber associated with phase variation over Δx.

D. Tradeoff: Localization Cost and Phase Structure

  1. The more localized a mode is in space (Δx), the larger the typical phase gradient (Δp):

    • Minimizing total cost for a given Δx gives a lower bound on possible Δp.
  2. Mathematically, the cost functional for a mode ψ(x) with width Δx and characteristic phase gradient k is:

    Cα|Φ|2d3xαk2Δx3
    • Subject to normalization and minimum action per phase winding (see Planck’s constant derivation).
  3. Minimizing total cost with respect to k and Δx under the winding constraint yields:

    ΔxΔp
    • Δpk by modal structure.

E. Quantitative Bound (Minimum Cost Argument)

F. No “Measurement” or “Observer” Required

G. Summary Statement

In PBG, the uncertainty principle is not postulated.
It is an inexorable, structural consequence of modal phase anchoring:

The lower bound (/2) is set by the calibration of the substrate’s anchoring costs—not by quantum postulate.



Closure and Predictive Power

By substituting the three substrate constants—calibrated once each from cross-domain observations:

every law and constant derived above, when evaluated numerically, matches the observed value (within the calibration and experimental uncertainties), with no free parameters, retuning, or hidden assumptions.

This “collapse to observation” is not possible in any standard framework without additional postulates or inputs.

Any failure of this matching would constitute a direct falsification of PBG.


Summary and Outlook

These four examples—gravity, general relativity, quantization, and uncertainty—demonstrate that PBG, with its single principle of modal phase anchoring, can rigorously generate the full spectrum of empirical laws and constants that are otherwise assumed as axiomatic. The process is fully explicit, algebraic, and closed: no hand-waving, no hidden substrate, and no ad hoc postulates. The same method applies across all domains of physics; these are but four illustrations of its scope and predictive power.